The Federal Court High
Court in Abuja on Thursday ordered the remand of the convener of #RevolutionNow
protest, Mr. Omoyele Sowore, and his co-defendant, Olawale Bakare, in the
custody of the Department of State Security Service, pending the hearing of their
bail application.
Justice Ijeoma Ojukwu
fixed Friday for the hearing of their bail application.
This followed the
arraignment of the defendants on seven counts of treasonable felony and other
sundry offences instituted against them by the Federal Government.
They pleaded not
guilty to the seven counts when read to them.
After the defendants
took their pleas, the defence lawyer, Adeyinka Olumide-Fusika (SAN), urged the
court to allow Sowore to be allowed to continue with the bail earlier granted
him by Justice Taiwo Taiwo, on September 24.
The defence lawyer
also pleaded that the second defendant be granted fresh bail.
But the judge said
since the bail earlier granted Sowore was not predicated on the charges on
which he was arraigned on Monday, a fresh bail had to be granted to him.
She added that if she
would have to grant them fresh bail, it had to be based on formal written
formal bail application and not oral.
She directed them to
file formal bail application and then adjourned hearing till Friday.
The application is to
be served on the lead prosecuting counsel, Hassan Liman (SAN), who indicated
that he was going to oppose the application.
The judge earlier
dismissed the objection of the defendants’ lawyer to the scheduled arraignment.
Olumide-Fusika had
maintained that the arraignment should not be allowed to go on on the grounds
that the Department of State Services, which has been keeping him in custody
since August 3, 2019, had not allowed the defendants to consult with their
lawyer after the charges were filed.
He added that the
court should protect its integrity by refusing to allow the arraignment to
proceed when the prosecution continued to disobey the court order made on
September 24, 2019 for the release.
But the prosecution
led by Hassan Liman (SAN) urged the court to dismiss the objection insisting
that what was more important was that the defendants had been served with the
charges.
Liman also said the order for the release of
the defendants had lapsed since the defendants had been produced in court for
arraignment.
إرسال تعليق
Drop Your Comment In The Box Below