Senate Rejects Natasha’s Resumption Plan, Insists On Due Process

The Nigerian Senate has refused Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan’s request to return to legislative duties, insisting that her six-month suspension remains legally binding until her ongoing court case is resolved.

In an official response signed by the Acting Clerk to the National Assembly, Dr. Yahaya Danzaria, the Senate acknowledged receiving Akpoti-Uduaghan’s notice of intent to resume plenary sessions on September 4, 2025. 

The senator, representing Kogi Central, argued that her suspension period had elapsed and that she was ready to return to the chamber.

However, the Senate made it clear that the matter is still under judicial consideration. “The issue is presently before the Court of Appeal, and as such, it remains sub judice,” the letter stated. 

“Until the legal process is completed and a formal review is carried out in light of the court’s decision, no administrative step can be taken to facilitate your return.”

Akpoti-Uduaghan was suspended on March 6, 2025, following accusations of breaching Senate standing orders. 

The Federal High Court in Abuja later upheld the suspension, prompting her legal team to challenge the ruling at the appellate level.

A senior lawmaker, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, told reporters that the Senate is cautious not to interfere with the judiciary. 

“We cannot act while the case is in court,” the senator said. “The integrity of both the legislative and judicial arms must be preserved. Once the court makes its pronouncement, the Senate will take the next appropriate step.”

Legal analysts have described the standoff as a test of institutional boundaries between the legislature and the judiciary. 

“This case highlights how disciplinary actions within a legislative body can intersect with judicial oversight,” said an Abuja-based constitutional lawyer. “The final decision of the appellate court will likely set an important precedent.”

For now, Akpoti-Uduaghan remains unable to participate in Senate proceedings, with the leadership reaffirming that her suspension will only be reviewed after the appellate court delivers its judgment.